
Will we see last year's crowd numbers return for the opening of the 2011 auction season this weekend? Find out at marketnews.com.au on February 19th at 6pm.
Welcome to Million Dollar Melbourne in 2011
With the Auction Season Opener hitting us between the eyes on February 19, we know that the big question for buyers, sellers and agents is: What is going to happen in 2011?
The feeling in late 2010 was that the market was cooling and we shared that view on price – but we did not share that view on activity. The December market finished quite strongly activity wise.
What’s been happening so far in 2011?
During the last week in Jan, I personally went to 10 homes over $1million in Boroondara (Kew, Hawthorn, Balwyn, Canterbury etc). I was a little surprised at the solid numbers of people inspecting at all opens.
This past weekend (the first full one in February) I focused on Bayside, mainly Brighton, and it was very quiet, very different – with very few people. The exceptions were 62 Dendy St (David Hart) – a new home on a busy street; a big home at 33 Middle Crescent (Campbell Cooney) and a great little home at 26 Moffat (David Wilson). Why this last one hasn’t flown out the door yet I don’t know – we gave it a rating over 800. The other seven opens were poorly attended.
Flooding may have been one reason for the reduced activity in Bayside – this was only a few hours after that incredible rain. There were a number of cancelled opens due to inundation (a word we are hearing all too often at the moment) of garages.
Even so there is still plenty happening at Bayside’s Top End. 33 Chatsworth Brighton with 1300 sqm of absolute beachfront has just sold (with Stewart Lopez and Ian Jackson of Kay and Burton) for an undisclosed sum (we reckon around $12 million). And another property on the Golden Mile beachfront at Shandford Ave, with about 600 sqm, reportedly sold for north of $7 million with Nick Johnstone of JP Dixon. So Bayside Top End is not exactly dead yet.
Next week we have a full book of inspections at quality homes on and off market in Stonnington. Look out for our reports.
So back to the season opener on February 19. This will be the first real public test of the auction market. What sort of stock numbers are out there at the moment?
Last year we used 100 auctions as the definition of a big Saturday. We had four of them in a row at the end of the year, after a very slow start to Spring caused by the election and then the election result uncertainty.
This February 19 sees 74 auctions scheduled – a solid start without setting the world on fire. It is February 26 that provides us with our first real 2011 benchmark with over 120 homes under the hammer. We think that weekend will be the first of about a dozen benchmark auction days we will have through 2011..
So what are the results we are looking at and what will they mean?
Bidderman, our bidders per auction indicator, is an important guide of demand. With Bidderman dropping to around 1 late last year we saw prices drop. A similar number on the first Super Saturday will not be a good sign for sellers especially because there is good stock quality on both auction days (hence no excuses), so a low Bidderman will indicate a genuine lack of interest. If that were to continue we would definitely see a drop in prices. Of course it will be a different result if Bidderman averages more than 2 bidders per auction.
The other important measure is clearance rates. These strengthened towards the end of last year – not because buyers went berserk but because sellers were forced to meet the diminished market conditions. We had a “strongish” late market because of seller flexibility.
What will the clearance rate numbers mean? If the clearance rates at for these two auction Saturdays are in the 50% range we would consider the market to be soft, marking the beginning of a buyers’ market. If clearance rates are between 60 and 70% for both weekends then it’s fairly balanced. If the clearance rate is around or more than70% then the market noise would be strong and, depending on stock levels going forward, prices may move upwards.
CAV slackens off on Conflict Of Interest issue
One item of news that has snuck under the radar is Consumer Affairs slackening off of the old Section 55 of the Estate Agents Act. This set out a rigorous process in cases where agents want to buy vendors’ homes that are being handled by their own agency, for instance where a Hocking Stuart agent is buying a Hocking Stuart advertised property. Consumer Affairs has severely diluted the strength of the legislation by saying it no longer requires an independent valuation and that an unqualified representative can sign off like a lawyer or an accountant.
This dilution is dangerous and is being driven by either ignorance or laziness on the part of CAV. Selling agents are not asking for it; in fact many ethical agents abhor CAV actions in this matter. We all need checks and balances.
The Consumer watchdog has abrogated its responsibilities, leaving vulnerable old ladies and others to be taken for a ride.
We don’t think agents should be allowed to buy a property handled by the agency they work for at all – there is just too much conflict of interest. But if the law and CAV allows this to continue there MUST be rigorous checks and balances in place to protect the vulnerable.
Imagine if the police weakened their stance on fraud because they wanted to streamline their paperwork. This is not good enough CAV.
On a lighter note, over this year 2011 we will be bringing you even more information, more sold results, more stats, and more detailed analysis.
We will also be back to the job we love most – buying great properties for our clients. After one week back, we’ve already made our first client home purchase for a property in Thomas St Hampton. After six weeks away with the kids - we need to get our sanity back. So bring on those auctions.
Buy Well.


















































Join us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Share on digg
Subscribe to RSS feed